News and insights banner
In the Spring Budget of March, Jeremy Hunt announced an extension to Agricultural Property Relief (APR). This means that land managed under environmental agreements won't lose APR. If you're a landowner considering changing the use of your land to deliver environmental schemes, this is for you.
However, with the recent General Election, it's uncertain whether Labour will maintain this extension. So, keep this in mind as you read on.
Interestingly, the land needn't have qualified for APR during that two year period. For example, someone might have poor pasture which hadn’t been grazed for two years, so it wouldn't qualify for APR as it wasn't being occupied for agricultural purposes. However, it would still count as agricultural land. HMRC is expected to provide further guidance on this point.
The government didn't designate land used for environmental schemes as a trading activity for Business Property Relief (BPR). Instead, the general rules for BPR will continue to apply. HMRC confirmed that land used for the Woodland Carbon Code or Peatland Code would generally likely qualify for BPR, due to the amount of activity needed to manage the land according to these Codes.
While the Spring Budget announcement was a significant step, there is still some detail to be provided. A joint working group between HM Treasury, HMRC, and industry representatives is being set up to look at the tax treatment of ecosystem services more broadly, which should provide further clarity in the future.
For more information and examples of how the extension will apply, go to the GOV.UK page on the taxation of environmental management and ecosystem service markets.